PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STUDENT FASILITATOR AND EXPLAINING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN LITERASI BACA TULIS DAN LITERASI DIGITAL SISWA SD

Authors

  • I Putu Suardipa STAH Negeri Mpu Kuturan, Indonesia
  • Ida Bagus Putrayasa Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • I Komang Wahyu Wiguna Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38048/jipcb.v9i1.605

Keywords:

model pembelajaran student fasilitator and explaining, literasi baca tulis, literasi digital

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui besarnya pengaruh model pembelajaran terhadap Literasi digital dan Literasi Baca Tulis pada mata pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Model pembelajaran yang diterapkan adalah Model Pembelajaran Student Fasilitator and Explaining. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu dengan populasi siswa kelas VI SD Gerokgak-Buleleng yang berjumlah 112 siswa, dan sampel penelitian berjumlah 60 siswa yang di. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan MANOVA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) Dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan dalam Literasi digital antara siswa yang mengikuti Model Pembelajaran Student Fasilitator and Explaining dan siswa yang mengikuti model konvensional, (dengan F= 11,331; taraf signifikansi 0,001<0,05); (2) Dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan dalam Kemampuan Literasi Baca Tulis antara siswa yang mengikuti Model Pembelajaran Student Fasilitator and Explaining dan siswa yang mengikuti model konvensional (dengan F= 22,749; taraf signifikansi 0,000<0,05); (3) Dapat disimpulkan bahwa secara simultan terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan dalam Literasi digital dan Kemampuan Literasi Baca Tulis antara siswa yang mengikuti model pembelajaran Student Fasilitator and Explaining dan siswa yang mengikuti model konvensional (F= 14,550 taraf sig 0,000< 0,05).

References

Annad, Enu dang sigh. (2017). Hypertension Stages adan Their Associated Risk Factors among Adult Women in India. Journal of population Social Studies Vol 25 No 1. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061779

Asih, Sari, dkk (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Student Facilitator and Explaining Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa pada materi SPLTV Kelas X MIPA. Jurnal of educational riew and researceh. Vol 04. No 01 retrieved from: https://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/JERR/article/view/2256

Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218–259. DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000007083

Candiasa, I Made. (2007). Statistik Multivariat Petunjuk Analisis dengan SPSS. Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja.

Dadang S, at all. (2017). Gerakan Literasi Nasional. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. Kemendikbud. Available at: repositori.kemdikbud.go.id retrieved from https://gln.kemdikbud.go.id/glnsite/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/cover-materi-pendukung-literasi-digital-gabung.pdf

Dalman. (2014). Keterampilan Menulis. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

De Freitas, Vinícius Adriano (2021) To understand the proposal of literacy: The textbook for the first year of elementary school in focus. Acta Scientiarum Vol 6;2 DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2021-0001

Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. (2011). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Eka, Karunia. (2018). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama

Eristiani, Sri, dkk. (2020). Model Pembelajaran Student Facilitator and Explaining Berbantuan Media Pembelajaran Sederhana Terhadap Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru. DOI: 10.23887/jippg.v3i1.27542

Febrianto, P. T., Mas'udah, S., & Megasari, L. (2020). lmplementation of Online Learning during The Covid-19 Pandemic on Madura lsland, lndonesia. International Joumal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 233-254 1694-2493 retrieved from : https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2503

Hague, Cassie dan Sarah Payton. (2010). Digital Literacy Across the Curriculum: a Futurelab Handbook. United Kingdom retrieved from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/futl06/futl06.pdf

Handayani, Zega, dkk. (2019). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Menggunakan Sketchware Untuk Mengetahui Kemampuan Literasi Visual Pada Materi Good Manufacturing Practices Di Smk Pertanian Pembangunan Negeri Lembang. Skripsi. Program Studi Pendidikan Teknologi Agroindustri. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Bandung. retrieved from : http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/44291

Huang, C.J., Liu, M.C., Chang, K.E., Sung, Y.T., Huang, T.H., Chen, C.H., Shen, H.Y., Huang, K., Liao, J.J., Hu, K.W., Luo, Y.C., & Chang, T.Y. (2010). A learning assistance tool for enhancing ICT literacy of elementary school students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 126–138. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/74921/

Huda, Miftahul. (2013). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Imas Kurniasih & Berlin Sani. (2015). Ragam Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran untuk Peningkatan Profesionalitas Guru. Jogjakarta: Kata Pena

Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 211–221 DOI; 10.1177/0163443710393382

Locknar, A., Mitchell, R., Rankin, J., & Sadoway, D. (2012). Integration of information literacy components into a large first-year lecture-based chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 487–491. DOI:10.1021/ed200252q

McGowan, U. (2018). Integrated Academic Literacy Development: Learner-Teacher Autonomy for MELTing the Barriers. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(4), 6. DOI 10.53761/1.15.4.6

Meier, Dave. (2002). The Accelerated Learning Handbook: Panduan Kreatif & Efektif Merancang Program Pendidikan dan Penelitian. Bandung: Kaifa.

Mitchell, O. S. (2007). Financial literacy and retirement planning: New evidence from the Rand American Life Panel. Working Papers wp157, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center. retrieved from : https://ideas.repec.org/p/mrr/papers/wp157.html

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results in Focus. from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results- in-focus.pdf

Perry, K. H., & Homan, A. (2014). “What I Feel in My Heart” Literacy Practices of and for the Self Among Adults With Limited or No Schooling. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(4), 422-454. DOI: 10.1177/1086296X14568839

Petrone, R. (2013). Linking Contemporary Research on Youth, Literacy, and Popular Culture with Literacy Teacher Education. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(3), 240-266. DOI: 10.1177/1086296X13492981

Phelps-Tschang, J., Miller, E., Rice K., & Primack, B. (2015). Web-based media literacy to prevent tobacco use among high school students. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 7(3), 29–40. ISSN: 2167-8715 https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jmle/about.html

Pinto, L., Boler, M., & Norris, T. (2007). Literacy is Just Reading and Writing, isn't it? the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test and its Press Coverage. Policy Futures in Education, 5(1), 84-99. DOI:10.2304/pfie.2007.5.1.84

PIRLS. (2011). International report. performance at the PIRLS 2011. Lynch School of Education, Boston College: International Benchmarks TIMMS & PIRLS Report International Study Center (IEA). ISBN 0478131003

Primack, B.A., Douglas, E.L, Land, S.R., Miller, E., & Fine, M.J. (2014). Comparison of media literacy and usual education to prevent tobacco use: A cluster randomized trial. Journal of School Health, 84(2), 106–115. DOI: 10.1111/josh.12130.

Purcell-Gates, V., Anderson, J., Gagne, M., Jang, K., Lenters, K. A., & McTavish, M. (2012). Measuring Situated Literacy Activity: Challenges and Promises. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(4), 396-425. doi: 10.1177/1086296X12457167

Rahanu, H., Georgiadou, E., Khan, N., Colson, R., Hill, V., & Edwards, J. A. (2016). The Development of Student Learning and Information Lliteracy: A Case Study. Education for Information, 32(3), 211-224. doi: 10.3233/EFI-150959

Rogers, T., Tyson, C., & Marshall, E. (2000). Living Dialogues in One Neighborhood: Moving Toward Understanding Across Discourses and Practices of Literacy and Schooling. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(1), 1-24. ISSN-1086-296X retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ648607

Solikhah, I. (2015). Reading and Writing as Academic Literacy in EAP Program of Indonesian Leaners. Dinamika Ilmu: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 325-341. DOI: 10.21093/di.v15i2.261

Street, B. (2003). What’s “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical Approaches to Literacy in Theory and Practice. Current issues in comparative education, 5(2), 77-91. https://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/pdf/25734_5_2_Street.pdf

Sudijono. (2013). Pengantar Evaluasi pendidikan. PT. Raja Grafindo

Sudjana. (2005). Metode Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito

Wingate, U. (2012). Using Academic Literacies and Genre-Based Models for Academic Writing Instruction: A ‘Literacy’ Journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 26-37. DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006

Yuet-Ming Ng, Peggy PL. 2020. Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) Prevention: Virtual Class Room Education for Hand Hygiene. Nurse Education in Practice Journal. Vol. 4. No. 5. Hlm 1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102782

Downloads

Published

2022-03-23

How to Cite

Suardipa, I. P., Putrayasa, I. B., & Wiguna, I. K. W. (2022). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STUDENT FASILITATOR AND EXPLAINING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN LITERASI BACA TULIS DAN LITERASI DIGITAL SISWA SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 9(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.38048/jipcb.v9i1.605

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check